Share 
Gaming Edge’s TL;DR
- A Massachusetts man who says he struggles with gambling addiction is suing Kalshi in a class-action after losing tens of thousands on the platform’s newly expanded sports markets.
- This case – and a related state enforcement action – could affect how prediction markets operate and what protections bettors can expect nationwide.
Nicholas Smith of Raynham says he typically uses voluntary self-exclusion tools to avoid wagering, but neither Kalshi nor Robinhood offered those safeguards when Kalshi added sports markets last year.
Smith claims he lost tens of thousands of dollars in a single month and has now filed a class-action in Suffolk County Superior Court on April 22 seeking repayment.
The complaint asserts Kalshi’s event contracts function like sports bets but lack consumer protections. It calls Kalshi’s characterization of the products as derivatives “illusory.”
Massachusetts AG Andrea Campbell has pursued separate litigation, winning a Jan. 20 preliminary injunction ordering Kalshi to stop taking wagers from state residents – a ruling Kalshi has appealed and temporarily delayed.
Class-action invoking Statute of Anne
The case highlights gaps in player protections on prediction markets that crossover into sports betting.
Regulators and the complaint point to specific consumer safety shortfalls:
- Allowing 18-year-olds to wager where the state minimum is 21
- No self-limits, deposit or wager caps
- Limited responsible gaming tools
If the class-action or the AG’s suit succeeds, affected users could recover losses and platforms may be forced to add mandatory safeguards or obtain state licenses.
Operators that rely on federal approvals (like Kalshi’s CFTC clearance for event contracts) may face increased state-level scrutiny, potential enforcement actions, and slower expansion plans. And platforms hosted by third parties (such as Robinhood) could face legal and reputational exposure as well.
The state case returns to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court for oral arguments soon, putting the injunction’s future on the line. Kalshi has appealed earlier Superior Court findings that it likely operated illegal gambling. The class-action is invoking the centuries-old Statute of Anne to recover losses, but timelines for rulings and appeals remain uncertain.
Based on reporting by Beth Treffeisen for Boston.com.
